Will new-born babies who die before they are able to choose
Christ be lost? Many people seem to have the idea that it depends on the
parents. If the parents are saved, then the child will be saved. If the
parents are lost, then the child will be lost. However, in light of the
gospel, this does not make sense. Humanity is lost or saved on the
basis what Adam and Christ has done. The word of God teaches us that all
men became sinful and lost because of Adam’s sin. However, the same
word teaches us that salvation is available to all because of what
Christ did. Of course, for a person to receive the gift of salvation in
Christ, he must make a choice. He must choose to believe in the gift of
God.
But what about a child who is too young to choose, whose
mind is so undeveloped that he is incapable of making conscious and
rational choices, and yet, who dies in such a state? What will the just
God do in the case of such children? For those who believe it depends on
our works it presents a problem. The best answer they can come up with
is to say that it depends on whether or not the parents themselves are
saved. Therefore, the parents become the saviours of the children
instead of Christ. On some issues it is unwise to be dogmatic. However,
when we examine the question in the light of the gospel, one option
seems reasonable. Adam’s sin killed all men. Jesus’ righteousness has
made salvation available to all men. Jesus’ life overturned the
consequences of Adam’s life and this becomes a reality for all who will
believe. In fact, the Bible states it thus:
Therefore as by
the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so
by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto
justification of life. (Rom 5:18)
If Adam killed all of us,
including babies, but Jesus died for all of us, including babies, then
on which side would we put a baby who is incapable of making a choice
for himself? What is the just thing to do? Remember that the baby did
not choose Christ (because he cannot) but neither did he choose to be
born into this world. In both cases, he has no choice. But Christ died
for him. Is the sin of Adam stronger than the righteousness of Christ?
Is Adam’s condemnation greater than the grace of God?
…. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: (Rom 5:20)
I believe that when we understand the gospel properly, it is reasonable
to believe that babies who cannot choose will be saved on the basis of
what Christ has done for all men.
Of course, the question
remains, what about the carnal nature? Will not those babies still have a
carnal nature? Christ has made it legally possible for them to have
life, but what about the fact that these babies have a carnal nature?
Just as God gives a new life, a new nature to the person who believes,
He is able to do the same for a baby. But does He have the right to do
this? His sacrifice for all men certainly gives Him that right.
Righteousness by Faith